<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gamed Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fascinationplace.org/2007/07/25/gamed-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2007/07/25/gamed-out/</link>
	<description>Michael Rawdon&#039;s webjournal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:34:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Subrata Sircar</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2007/07/25/gamed-out/comment-page-1/#comment-4214</link>
		<dc:creator>Subrata Sircar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/2007/07/25/gamed-out/#comment-4214</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure loosening your standards is necessarily better - don&#039;t you want people to play low cards against you, up to a point?  On the other hand, bluffing more often might work; not playing more hands, but playing utter crap every so often.

One of the other considerations is that playing against casual players for amounts of money they don&#039;t take seriously can end up frustrating any strategy, since many close decisions come down to &quot;bet, it&#039;s more fun&quot;.

The Ravnica guildmages are very strong, particularly if you&#039;re playing both their colors.  I tend to pick the ones in my colors whenever they get to me, above everything else.  (I first-picked a foil Guildmage and third-picked the second in the last pack Monday, for example, passing up an Assault Zepplid and some strong red-green cards to do it.)  I&#039;ve never seen an &lt;a href=&quot;http://ww2.wizards.com/gatherer/CardDetails.aspx?&amp;id=96921&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Orzhov Guildmage&lt;/a&gt;, but I&#039;ll bet it&#039;s just brutal in draft/sealed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure loosening your standards is necessarily better &#8211; don&#8217;t you want people to play low cards against you, up to a point?  On the other hand, bluffing more often might work; not playing more hands, but playing utter crap every so often.</p>
<p>One of the other considerations is that playing against casual players for amounts of money they don&#8217;t take seriously can end up frustrating any strategy, since many close decisions come down to &#8220;bet, it&#8217;s more fun&#8221;.</p>
<p>The Ravnica guildmages are very strong, particularly if you&#8217;re playing both their colors.  I tend to pick the ones in my colors whenever they get to me, above everything else.  (I first-picked a foil Guildmage and third-picked the second in the last pack Monday, for example, passing up an Assault Zepplid and some strong red-green cards to do it.)  I&#8217;ve never seen an <a href="http://ww2.wizards.com/gatherer/CardDetails.aspx?&amp;id=96921" rel="nofollow">Orzhov Guildmage</a>, but I&#8217;ll bet it&#8217;s just brutal in draft/sealed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

