<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Week&#8217;s Haul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fascinationplace.org/2007/10/06/this-weeks-haul-51/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2007/10/06/this-weeks-haul-51/</link>
	<description>Michael Rawdon&#039;s webjournal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 22:37:50 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Rawdon</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2007/10/06/this-weeks-haul-51/comment-page-1/#comment-7415</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Rawdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 17:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/2007/10/06/this-weeks-haul-51/#comment-7415</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m having a hard time organizing my thoughts in response to your comment, Brian, so I&#039;ll just write what&#039;s in my head and hope it makes sense:

First of all, it worries me when any new series doesn&#039;t put its &quot;best foot forward&quot; out of the gate, by which I mean the terrific, no-holds-barred story which makes people feel that they &lt;i&gt;must&lt;/i&gt; read this comic.  This is especially true of a book which has a rich backdrop which needs time to unfold and be revealed.  I&#039;ve been reading comics long enough to know that despite the best intentions of the most capable and professional creators, many series just don&#039;t sell well enough to keep going.  So it&#039;s worrisome that Robo&#039;s first series is apparently going to be a sampler, since that doesn&#039;t seem to be putting his best foot forward.  Contrast with &lt;b&gt;Hellboy&lt;/b&gt;, in which his first series, &lt;b&gt;Seed of Destruction&lt;/b&gt;, was that knock-it-out-of-the-park yarn, and his backstory mostly got filled in later.

(On the other hand, for all I know you already know for sure that you&#039;ll be doing another series or two no matter how this one sells, in which case this concern doesn&#039;t apply.)

I&#039;m of two minds about the &quot;it&#039;s all interconnected&quot; aspect of the book.  On the one hand, I do prefer books with a cohesive world and a storyline that&#039;s building towards something (a.k.a. &quot;going somewhere&quot;), rather than a bunch of standalone stories which are basically independent of each other.  On the other hand, it&#039;s frustrating when a limited series comes out and moves the story along a little bit, but doesn&#039;t really resolve things (or worse, seems to keep stringing us along forever).  To go back to Hellboy, the latter characterizes both the current &lt;b&gt;Hellboy&lt;/b&gt; and &lt;b&gt;B.P.R.D.&lt;/b&gt; series - there&#039;s motion, but little apparent progress, in that I have no idea if we&#039;re getting closer to the end of the larger story.

All of which means that my hope for Robo is that this first series will tell a complete story, rather than be the beginning of some larger story or be six unrelated stories.  (It might &lt;i&gt;also&lt;/i&gt; be the beginning of a larger story, of course.)  Admittedly this is something of a balancing act.  I think the best example of a successful use of this approach is Neil Gaiman&#039;s &lt;b&gt;Sandman&lt;/b&gt;, although it wasn&#039;t released as a series of mini-series.

To turn my criticism on myself, it&#039;s not entirely fair to review a mini-series based on the first issue, since there are still five yet to come, and certainly everything could change in that time.  In my defense, I&#039;m expressing my first impressions of the series based on all I&#039;ve got to go on at the moment, which is one of the pitfalls of serial publication in the first place.  As both creators and readers, we&#039;re both somewhat at the mercy of the industry format, I&#039;m afraid.

Anyway, one other positive thing: I was much amused by Robo&#039;s handling of the guards he encounters in the story.  I think that sort of humor, as much as anything, made me feel that I want to see how this first series, at least plays out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m having a hard time organizing my thoughts in response to your comment, Brian, so I&#8217;ll just write what&#8217;s in my head and hope it makes sense:</p>
<p>First of all, it worries me when any new series doesn&#8217;t put its &#8220;best foot forward&#8221; out of the gate, by which I mean the terrific, no-holds-barred story which makes people feel that they <i>must</i> read this comic.  This is especially true of a book which has a rich backdrop which needs time to unfold and be revealed.  I&#8217;ve been reading comics long enough to know that despite the best intentions of the most capable and professional creators, many series just don&#8217;t sell well enough to keep going.  So it&#8217;s worrisome that Robo&#8217;s first series is apparently going to be a sampler, since that doesn&#8217;t seem to be putting his best foot forward.  Contrast with <b>Hellboy</b>, in which his first series, <b>Seed of Destruction</b>, was that knock-it-out-of-the-park yarn, and his backstory mostly got filled in later.</p>
<p>(On the other hand, for all I know you already know for sure that you&#8217;ll be doing another series or two no matter how this one sells, in which case this concern doesn&#8217;t apply.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m of two minds about the &#8220;it&#8217;s all interconnected&#8221; aspect of the book.  On the one hand, I do prefer books with a cohesive world and a storyline that&#8217;s building towards something (a.k.a. &#8220;going somewhere&#8221;), rather than a bunch of standalone stories which are basically independent of each other.  On the other hand, it&#8217;s frustrating when a limited series comes out and moves the story along a little bit, but doesn&#8217;t really resolve things (or worse, seems to keep stringing us along forever).  To go back to Hellboy, the latter characterizes both the current <b>Hellboy</b> and <b>B.P.R.D.</b> series &#8211; there&#8217;s motion, but little apparent progress, in that I have no idea if we&#8217;re getting closer to the end of the larger story.</p>
<p>All of which means that my hope for Robo is that this first series will tell a complete story, rather than be the beginning of some larger story or be six unrelated stories.  (It might <i>also</i> be the beginning of a larger story, of course.)  Admittedly this is something of a balancing act.  I think the best example of a successful use of this approach is Neil Gaiman&#8217;s <b>Sandman</b>, although it wasn&#8217;t released as a series of mini-series.</p>
<p>To turn my criticism on myself, it&#8217;s not entirely fair to review a mini-series based on the first issue, since there are still five yet to come, and certainly everything could change in that time.  In my defense, I&#8217;m expressing my first impressions of the series based on all I&#8217;ve got to go on at the moment, which is one of the pitfalls of serial publication in the first place.  As both creators and readers, we&#8217;re both somewhat at the mercy of the industry format, I&#8217;m afraid.</p>
<p>Anyway, one other positive thing: I was much amused by Robo&#8217;s handling of the guards he encounters in the story.  I think that sort of humor, as much as anything, made me feel that I want to see how this first series, at least plays out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Wegener &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ATOMIC ROBO -Out This Week Suckas!!</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2007/10/06/this-weeks-haul-51/comment-page-1/#comment-7403</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Wegener &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ATOMIC ROBO -Out This Week Suckas!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 14:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/2007/10/06/this-weeks-haul-51/#comment-7403</guid>
		<description>[...] here’s another one over at Fascination Place. Mike gives us a cautiously friendly review, but considering how disappointed he seems with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here’s another one over at Fascination Place. Mike gives us a cautiously friendly review, but considering how disappointed he seems with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2007/10/06/this-weeks-haul-51/comment-page-1/#comment-7279</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 22:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/2007/10/06/this-weeks-haul-51/#comment-7279</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;it doesn’t feel like something that will be cohesive in the long term, or have some ultimate direction or destination&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Perfectly understandable.  The first 6-issue mini doesn&#039;t do much to dissuade the notion that it is a series of &quot;frivolous adventure yarns&quot;.  We intended it is a grab bag for readers to get a feel for Robo and his place in the world.  That said, there is nothing that happens for no reason either.  We have a timeline that dates back to the 19th century.  It&#039;s all interconnected.  Our hope is that people will enjoy Robo enough to allow us to keep publishing issues so that the bigger picture will be revealed -- both to the reader and to Robo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;it doesn’t feel like something that will be cohesive in the long term, or have some ultimate direction or destination&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Perfectly understandable.  The first 6-issue mini doesn&#8217;t do much to dissuade the notion that it is a series of &#8220;frivolous adventure yarns&#8221;.  We intended it is a grab bag for readers to get a feel for Robo and his place in the world.  That said, there is nothing that happens for no reason either.  We have a timeline that dates back to the 19th century.  It&#8217;s all interconnected.  Our hope is that people will enjoy Robo enough to allow us to keep publishing issues so that the bigger picture will be revealed &#8212; both to the reader and to Robo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
