<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Fascination Place</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fascinationplace.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org</link>
	<description>Deniable plausibility</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Once More Around the Bay Area by David Gallagher</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2007/04/30/once-more-around-the-bay-area/#comment-53041</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gallagher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/2007/04/30/once-more-around-the-bay-area/#comment-53041</guid>
		<description>it'd be great if you changed the link in this post too and... the new site doesn't play annoying music!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;d be great if you changed the link in this post too and&#8230; the new site doesn&#8217;t play annoying music!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Only Hundreds of Miles by Car by David Gallagher</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2008/05/22/only-hundreds-of-miles-by-car/#comment-53040</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gallagher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/?p=503#comment-53040</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your link the Musee Mecanique, sorry you don't like the layout as much, I'll talk to Dan about it.

I want to point out that the Musee has a new web site at 

http://www.museemecaniquesf.com

It's long story, but the old site is not owned or operated by Dan Zelinsky, the owner of the Musee. It would be great if you could change the link in your post to the new site.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your link the Musee Mecanique, sorry you don&#8217;t like the layout as much, I&#8217;ll talk to Dan about it.</p>
<p>I want to point out that the Musee has a new web site at </p>
<p><a href="http://www.museemecaniquesf.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.museemecaniquesf.com</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s long story, but the old site is not owned or operated by Dan Zelinsky, the owner of the Musee. It would be great if you could change the link in your post to the new site.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WALL-E by patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2008/07/12/wall-e/#comment-53023</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/?p=540#comment-53023</guid>
		<description>Wall-E totally looks like the robot from "Short Circuit"... minus the cheesy 80's style of course</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wall-E totally looks like the robot from &#8220;Short Circuit&#8221;&#8230; minus the cheesy 80&#8217;s style of course</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Minor Details by mo pie</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2008/07/09/minor-details/#comment-53018</link>
		<dc:creator>mo pie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/?p=538#comment-53018</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this update, mhr. I just noticed mopie.com was down and jumped to conclusions, but it's nice to have them validated!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this update, mhr. I just noticed mopie.com was down and jumped to conclusions, but it&#8217;s nice to have them validated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Getting Some Perspective by Michael Rawdon</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2008/01/11/getting-some-perspective/#comment-53016</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Rawdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 05:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/2008/01/11/getting-some-perspective/#comment-53016</guid>
		<description>Dang, I really need to!  Where the hell has the year gone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang, I really need to!  Where the hell has the year gone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Getting Some Perspective by Jim Rittenhouse</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2008/01/11/getting-some-perspective/#comment-53015</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Rittenhouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/2008/01/11/getting-some-perspective/#comment-53015</guid>
		<description>"And boy does that put things in perspective."

Yep, it sure does.  

"Which is, you know, not often enough. So now I’m thinking I should make time this year to go visit him and his family (especially since his daughter apparently doubts my existence), or at least, y’know, call more often."

Oh, you're always welcome.  Or at least, gimme a call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And boy does that put things in perspective.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yep, it sure does.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Which is, you know, not often enough. So now I’m thinking I should make time this year to go visit him and his family (especially since his daughter apparently doubts my existence), or at least, y’know, call more often.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh, you&#8217;re always welcome.  Or at least, gimme a call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Space: 1999 by Mark Dykeman</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2008/07/01/space-1999/#comment-53004</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dykeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/?p=534#comment-53004</guid>
		<description>And that Space:1999 article has been published!   Here's the link:


http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/07/03/10-ways-to-make-a-kick-ass-version-of-space1999</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that Space:1999 article has been published!   Here&#8217;s the link:</p>
<p><a href="http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/07/03/10-ways-to-make-a-kick-ass-version-of-space1999" rel="nofollow">http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/07/03/10-ways-to-make-a-kick-ass-version-of-space1999</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Space: 1999 by Mark Dykeman</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2008/07/01/space-1999/#comment-53003</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dykeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/?p=534#comment-53003</guid>
		<description>I actually started working on a treatment or bible for a revised Space:1999, doing something similar to what's been done with BSG.  I still have a bunch of notes for it and I'd love to have it see the light of day someday.

In the interim, I'm hoping to have a short article published at Geeks of Doom (website) called 10 Ways To Make A Kick Ass Remake of Space:1999.  Which makes it doubly odd to see this cool post from you, Michael.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually started working on a treatment or bible for a revised Space:1999, doing something similar to what&#8217;s been done with BSG.  I still have a bunch of notes for it and I&#8217;d love to have it see the light of day someday.</p>
<p>In the interim, I&#8217;m hoping to have a short article published at Geeks of Doom (website) called 10 Ways To Make A Kick Ass Remake of Space:1999.  Which makes it doubly odd to see this cool post from you, Michael.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Space: 1999 by Michael Rawdon</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2008/07/01/space-1999/#comment-53002</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Rawdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/?p=534#comment-53002</guid>
		<description>&lt;u&gt;iamza&lt;/u&gt;: Yeah, the series ran for two seasons, and Maia was in the second season.  I used to have a full set of the novelizations, plus the "making of" volume, but I chucked them years ago.  They're still pretty easy to find through used bookstores.

&lt;u&gt;John&lt;/u&gt;: &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark_(TV_series)" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Quark&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;!  Ha!  Another marginal semi-SF series right along with &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fantastic_Journey" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Fantastic Journey&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otherworld_(TV_series)" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Otherworld&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;!  Not to mention the execrable &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Rangers_(TV_series)" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Space Rangers&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.

Unfortunately (?) &lt;b&gt;Quark&lt;/b&gt; was basically rendered obsolete by the far better parody &lt;a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0177789/" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Galaxy Quest&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;u&gt;Mikey&lt;/u&gt;: I think to do an ongoing series you'd have to contrive something fantastic to make it work, e.g. the wormhole idea I mentioned.  Or some sort of phenomenon a la Robert Charles Wilson's &lt;i&gt;Spin&lt;/i&gt;.

This sort of points out the meta-flaw in &lt;b&gt;Space: 1999&lt;/b&gt;: It's a generic science fiction adventure series, the things that make it unique are really &lt;i&gt;incidental&lt;/i&gt; to the basic thrust of the show.  It treats its setting as a generic near-future setting (obviously inspired a great deal by &lt;b&gt;2001&lt;/b&gt;), it has generic characters who are there to solve fairly generic adventure problems, and even the title is remarkable generic, not really saying anything about the series.  Even &lt;b&gt;Star Trek&lt;/b&gt; has a more descriptive title!  All the neat stuff is below the surface, unfortunately so far below that it's pretty well smothered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><u>iamza</u>: Yeah, the series ran for two seasons, and Maia was in the second season.  I used to have a full set of the novelizations, plus the &#8220;making of&#8221; volume, but I chucked them years ago.  They&#8217;re still pretty easy to find through used bookstores.</p>
<p><u>John</u>: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark_(TV_series)" rel="nofollow"><b>Quark</b></a>!  Ha!  Another marginal semi-SF series right along with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fantastic_Journey" rel="nofollow"><b>The Fantastic Journey</b></a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otherworld_(TV_series)" rel="nofollow"><b>Otherworld</b></a>!  Not to mention the execrable <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Rangers_(TV_series)" rel="nofollow"><b>Space Rangers</b></a>.</p>
<p>Unfortunately (?) <b>Quark</b> was basically rendered obsolete by the far better parody <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0177789/" rel="nofollow"><b>Galaxy Quest</b></a>.</p>
<p><u>Mikey</u>: I think to do an ongoing series you&#8217;d have to contrive something fantastic to make it work, e.g. the wormhole idea I mentioned.  Or some sort of phenomenon a la Robert Charles Wilson&#8217;s <i>Spin</i>.</p>
<p>This sort of points out the meta-flaw in <b>Space: 1999</b>: It&#8217;s a generic science fiction adventure series, the things that make it unique are really <i>incidental</i> to the basic thrust of the show.  It treats its setting as a generic near-future setting (obviously inspired a great deal by <b>2001</b>), it has generic characters who are there to solve fairly generic adventure problems, and even the title is remarkable generic, not really saying anything about the series.  Even <b>Star Trek</b> has a more descriptive title!  All the neat stuff is below the surface, unfortunately so far below that it&#8217;s pretty well smothered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Space: 1999 by Uncle Mikey</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2008/07/01/space-1999/#comment-53001</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/?p=534#comment-53001</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Space: 1999&lt;/i&gt; is a guilty pleasure for me, for some reason. I know it's bad and cheesy and most of its stories just don't really work very well if you think about them for more than about a quarter-second.

And yet, some of the things you pointed out bring me back to it periodically. The design of the moonbase itself, and the Eagles, still hold up remarkably well, even if the costumes do not. There are occasional, serious attempts to suggest the hardship of the situation, the claustrophobia inherent in knowing that you might never be able to breathe unrecycled air ever again in your life and that these 300...oops, 299...oops...270 people are the only human faces you'll ever see again, and every week someone else dies.

I also wonder if there would be any way to do a "Galactican" reinvention of this show, but I really don't think you could. I think you &lt;b&gt;could&lt;/b&gt; do a serious SF show about a stranded colony on an unterraformed world or moon, but not as a open-ended series. Because if you're trying to be serious about it, you won't have alien-of-the-week or even crisis-of-the-week. Most of the time, life would actually be pretty dull, assuming the colony survived the initial separation, however it occured. But you probably could do a limited series or miniseries focusing on the crisis itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Space: 1999</i> is a guilty pleasure for me, for some reason. I know it&#8217;s bad and cheesy and most of its stories just don&#8217;t really work very well if you think about them for more than about a quarter-second.</p>
<p>And yet, some of the things you pointed out bring me back to it periodically. The design of the moonbase itself, and the Eagles, still hold up remarkably well, even if the costumes do not. There are occasional, serious attempts to suggest the hardship of the situation, the claustrophobia inherent in knowing that you might never be able to breathe unrecycled air ever again in your life and that these 300&#8230;oops, 299&#8230;oops&#8230;270 people are the only human faces you&#8217;ll ever see again, and every week someone else dies.</p>
<p>I also wonder if there would be any way to do a &#8220;Galactican&#8221; reinvention of this show, but I really don&#8217;t think you could. I think you <b>could</b> do a serious SF show about a stranded colony on an unterraformed world or moon, but not as a open-ended series. Because if you&#8217;re trying to be serious about it, you won&#8217;t have alien-of-the-week or even crisis-of-the-week. Most of the time, life would actually be pretty dull, assuming the colony survived the initial separation, however it occured. But you probably could do a limited series or miniseries focusing on the crisis itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Space: 1999 by John Keating</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2008/07/01/space-1999/#comment-53000</link>
		<dc:creator>John Keating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/?p=534#comment-53000</guid>
		<description>I still have my "Space: 1999" lunch pail, although oddly I never watched it that much as a child. (Although I do have fond memories of staying up late to watch Quark. I dare Ron Moore to do a re-imagining of *that* show...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still have my &#8220;Space: 1999&#8243; lunch pail, although oddly I never watched it that much as a child. (Although I do have fond memories of staying up late to watch Quark. I dare Ron Moore to do a re-imagining of *that* show&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Space: 1999 by iamza</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2008/07/01/space-1999/#comment-52999</link>
		<dc:creator>iamza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 10:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/?p=534#comment-52999</guid>
		<description>Something that made me giggle as a kid: unspooling a cassette tape, and realizing that the evil telepathic monsters on that week's &lt;i&gt;Space: 1999&lt;/i&gt; episode were just people covered in unspooled tape. 

Didn't &lt;i&gt;Space: 1999&lt;/i&gt; feature a telepathic female called Maia, with funny beaded eyebrows and a ton of blusher on her cheeks? Or was that some other late seventies sci-fi show?

I never bought videotapes, but I did run across a couple of tie-in novels in a charity shop. They were really short novels, and the middle part of the book was stuffed with about 16 pages of black-and-white publicity pictures from the TV series. They were pretty fun reads, if I remember rightly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something that made me giggle as a kid: unspooling a cassette tape, and realizing that the evil telepathic monsters on that week&#8217;s <i>Space: 1999</i> episode were just people covered in unspooled tape. </p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t <i>Space: 1999</i> feature a telepathic female called Maia, with funny beaded eyebrows and a ton of blusher on her cheeks? Or was that some other late seventies sci-fi show?</p>
<p>I never bought videotapes, but I did run across a couple of tie-in novels in a charity shop. They were really short novels, and the middle part of the book was stuffed with about 16 pages of black-and-white publicity pictures from the TV series. They were pretty fun reads, if I remember rightly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This Week&#8217;s Haul by Fascination Place &#187; This Week&#8217;s Haul</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2007/10/22/this-weeks-haul-53/#comment-52992</link>
		<dc:creator>Fascination Place &#187; This Week&#8217;s Haul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/2007/10/22/this-weeks-haul-53/#comment-52992</guid>
		<description>[...] the book being grounded in Jack Kirby&#8217;s Fourth World characters doesn&#8217;t, since as I&#8217;ve said before I&#8217;ve never found them interesting, and this story has all the hallmarks of yet another scheme [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the book being grounded in Jack Kirby&#8217;s Fourth World characters doesn&#8217;t, since as I&#8217;ve said before I&#8217;ve never found them interesting, and this story has all the hallmarks of yet another scheme [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This Week&#8217;s Haul by JM Ringuet</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2008/06/22/this-weeks-haul-88/#comment-52974</link>
		<dc:creator>JM Ringuet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 05:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/?p=528#comment-52974</guid>
		<description>It's all good Michael. Actually nobody ever called my style 'underground' but why not? :)
Sparks is definitely a cool tense page turner that I'm sure you will enjoy.
Thanks again for the review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all good Michael. Actually nobody ever called my style &#8216;underground&#8217; but why not? <img src='http://www.fascinationplace.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Sparks is definitely a cool tense page turner that I&#8217;m sure you will enjoy.<br />
Thanks again for the review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This Week&#8217;s Haul by Michael Rawdon</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2008/06/22/this-weeks-haul-88/#comment-52973</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Rawdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/?p=528#comment-52973</guid>
		<description>Hi JM: Always a little surprising when a creator shows up on my journal. :-)

I admit that my preference in comics art is for more "realistic" art, albeit with some distinctive style.  George Pérez, Jerry Ordway, folks like that.  I'm not a big fan of the "underground" style, which yours seems more in the tradition of.  (Your style reminds me of &lt;a href="http://www.peterkuper.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Peter Kuper&lt;/a&gt;'s, actually.)

But yeah, I'll stick around and see how &lt;b&gt;Sparks&lt;/b&gt; pans out.  Whether or not it's my cup of tea, you guys seem enthusiastic enough that I do hope you find an audience!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi JM: Always a little surprising when a creator shows up on my journal. <img src='http://www.fascinationplace.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I admit that my preference in comics art is for more &#8220;realistic&#8221; art, albeit with some distinctive style.  George Pérez, Jerry Ordway, folks like that.  I&#8217;m not a big fan of the &#8220;underground&#8221; style, which yours seems more in the tradition of.  (Your style reminds me of <a href="http://www.peterkuper.com/" rel="nofollow">Peter Kuper</a>&#8217;s, actually.)</p>
<p>But yeah, I&#8217;ll stick around and see how <b>Sparks</b> pans out.  Whether or not it&#8217;s my cup of tea, you guys seem enthusiastic enough that I do hope you find an audience!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This Week&#8217;s Haul by JM Ringuet</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2008/06/22/this-weeks-haul-88/#comment-52970</link>
		<dc:creator>JM Ringuet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/?p=528#comment-52970</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the review Michael, glad to see that you gave attention to a 'smaller' book out there. We are small and we need the support you are giving us. Sorry to read you did not like the art, but I'm happy to see that you still want to know where the story goes; this is more of a Noir story than a superhero story, with a lot of twists and turns, drama and some solid character development, so it's really worth reading. If you can disregard the art, or just take it for what it is supposed to do that is to create a mood and some emotion, you are in for a thrill ride!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review Michael, glad to see that you gave attention to a &#8217;smaller&#8217; book out there. We are small and we need the support you are giving us. Sorry to read you did not like the art, but I&#8217;m happy to see that you still want to know where the story goes; this is more of a Noir story than a superhero story, with a lot of twists and turns, drama and some solid character development, so it&#8217;s really worth reading. If you can disregard the art, or just take it for what it is supposed to do that is to create a mood and some emotion, you are in for a thrill ride!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This Week&#8217;s Haul by Fascination Place &#187; This Week&#8217;s Haul</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2008/05/03/this-weeks-haul-81/#comment-52969</link>
		<dc:creator>Fascination Place &#187; This Week&#8217;s Haul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/?p=492#comment-52969</guid>
		<description>[...] If RASL #1 was disappointing for being nothing but set-up, issue #2 is a huge step forward in advancing the story and explaining what&#8217;s going on. We find out what RASL is (although not what it means), what the main character is doing (he&#8217;s moving between dimensions), and get some hints of both his backstory and who&#8217;s chasing him. So it&#8217;s got me hooked and I&#8217;m looking forward to where Smith takes all this. Bone was uneven at times, but ultimately it was a lot of fun even if it dragged in places. RASL is shaping up to be a completely different sort of story, and it&#8217;s exciting to see an artist as talented as Smith following up on his magnum opus with something that looks equally promising (quite different in that regard from Dave Sim&#8217;s Glamourpuss). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If RASL #1 was disappointing for being nothing but set-up, issue #2 is a huge step forward in advancing the story and explaining what&#8217;s going on. We find out what RASL is (although not what it means), what the main character is doing (he&#8217;s moving between dimensions), and get some hints of both his backstory and who&#8217;s chasing him. So it&#8217;s got me hooked and I&#8217;m looking forward to where Smith takes all this. Bone was uneven at times, but ultimately it was a lot of fun even if it dragged in places. RASL is shaping up to be a completely different sort of story, and it&#8217;s exciting to see an artist as talented as Smith following up on his magnum opus with something that looks equally promising (quite different in that regard from Dave Sim&#8217;s Glamourpuss). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gunnerkrigg Court by Michael Rawdon</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2008/06/17/gunnerkrigg-court/#comment-52963</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Rawdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/?p=524#comment-52963</guid>
		<description>Time well wasted, I say!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time well wasted, I say!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gunnerkrigg Court by Mark Bessey</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2008/06/17/gunnerkrigg-court/#comment-52962</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bessey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/?p=524#comment-52962</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I'm still not sure about the artwork (having wasted altogether too much time yesterday and today reading the first few chapters), but it does have a certain appeal. And what's not to like about a demon-possessed stuffed animal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I&#8217;m still not sure about the artwork (having wasted altogether too much time yesterday and today reading the first few chapters), but it does have a certain appeal. And what&#8217;s not to like about a demon-possessed stuffed animal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This Week&#8217;s Haul by Michael Rawdon</title>
		<link>http://www.fascinationplace.org/2008/06/09/this-weeks-haul-86/#comment-50643</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Rawdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 02:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fascinationplace.org/?p=518#comment-50643</guid>
		<description>It is pretty well done.  The music is eerily reminiscent of the incidental music on Trek, of course.

The comic hasn't yet fleshed out the cat.  It does personify Gary Seven a little bit, so far.  As I said, the second issue doesn't really add anything to the series' background, so there's really only the first issue to go on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is pretty well done.  The music is eerily reminiscent of the incidental music on Trek, of course.</p>
<p>The comic hasn&#8217;t yet fleshed out the cat.  It does personify Gary Seven a little bit, so far.  As I said, the second issue doesn&#8217;t really add anything to the series&#8217; background, so there&#8217;s really only the first issue to go on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
